لینک پرداخت و دانلود در "پایین مطلب"
فرمت فایل: word (قابل ویرایش و آماده پرینت)
تعداد صفحات 50
In other views, organizational knowledge is not merely consider as individual one. Some of knowledge exist in group for [10]. Then the knowledge which is measured or measure something should cover 2 classification of knowledge i,e implicit and explicit and group, individual and organizational one.
The second dimension of this tetragonal basis of figure 1 is types of knowledge in an organization, individual and group from implicitly and explicitly.
Knowledge transformation speed
Knowledge value
Indivisual knowledge
Explicit knowdege
Group knowledge
Implicit knowledge
Organizational knowledge
Figure 2: equipoised cube for measurement method the necessities for
- The cubical volume of figure 2 indicates integration of tetragonal base in measurement method with types of knowledge in organization
- So we have a cube of 6 types of knowledge (from the intersection of implicit and explicit knowledge with indivisual, group, organizational knowledge) that each of then must be compared in the Tetragonal of "knowledge volume" , "knowledge volue" , "knowledge interest and expenses" and "Transformation speed of knowledge".
- Now we should find a knowledge management model which is capable of integrating with this cognitive tetragonal model –Nonaka-
Jakichi Model is a suitable one to reconcile with this cognitive tetragonal model and can be considered as a basis for measurement model –Nonaka- Takochi Model as a cognitive model is based on types of knowledge. Hidden and obvious information have been discussed exactly in this model. In this model indivisual, group, organizational knowledge are converted to each other in a loop form too.
مقاله گلکار